report produced with glance, version 0.2.6.26
comparison generated Tue Jul 12 15:48:07 2011 by user wstraka on craackly.ssec.wisc.edu
file A:
path: /data/wstraka/Turb_v5_ARR/truth_500/geocatL2.GOES-12.2006096.231500.hdf
md5sum for file A: 6dab79e01be528ee74519f164ea3e57b
last modified: Fri Jul 8 14:17:01 2011
file B:
path: /data/wstraka/Turb_v5_ARR/test_data/GOES12_IMAGER_2006096_2315_00_AWG_TURBULENCE_071122011.nc
md5sum for file B: 076ef708f7ddd1a844f8260b15977f36
last modified: Tue Jul 12 15:43:18 2011
A configuration file was used to control the production report.
Please see this copy of the configuration file
for details.
latitude in A: pixel_latitude
latitude in B: Latitude
longitude in A: pixel_longitude
longitude in B: Longitude
WARNING: 4148515 data points
(96.04% of all data)
show possible mismatch in values stored in file a
and file b longitude and latitude values. Depending on the degree of mismatch, some data value comparisons
in this report may be distorted or spatially nonsensical. Please consider re-running this report and including an
examination of your longitude and latitude variables with appropriate epsilons in order to analyze the significance
of the difference.
variable name in A: pixel_longitude
variable name in B: Longitude
epsilon value: 0.1
"missing" data value in A: -32768
"missing" data value in B: -999.0
units in A: degrees_east
units in B: degrees_east