report produced with glance, version 0.2.6.26
comparison generated Tue Jul 12 15:51:02 2011 by user wstraka on craackly.ssec.wisc.edu
file A:
path: /data/wstraka/Turb_v5_ARR/truth_500/geocatL2.GOES-12.2006096.231500.hdf
md5sum for file A: 6dab79e01be528ee74519f164ea3e57b
last modified: Fri Jul 8 14:17:01 2011
file B:
path: /data/wstraka/Turb_v5_ARR/test_data/GOES12_IMAGER_2006096_2315_00_AWG_TURBULENCE_071122011.nc
md5sum for file B: 076ef708f7ddd1a844f8260b15977f36
last modified: Tue Jul 12 15:43:18 2011
A configuration file was used to control the production report.
Please see this copy of the configuration file
for details.
latitude in A: pixel_latitude
latitude in B: Latitude
longitude in A: pixel_longitude
longitude in B: Longitude
WARNING: 4148515 data points
(96.04% of all data)
show possible mismatch in values stored in file a
and file b longitude and latitude values. Depending on the degree of mismatch, some data value comparisons
in this report may be distorted or spatially nonsensical. Please consider re-running this report and including an
examination of your longitude and latitude variables with appropriate epsilons in order to analyze the significance
of the difference.
View mismatching points in A's lon/lat system
View mismatching points in B's lon/lat system
variable name in A: TropFoldsMain_caution_direction1
variable name in B: caution_direction_1
epsilon value: 0.1
"missing" data value: 0.0
units in A: none
units in B:
