report produced with glance, version 0.2.6.24
comparison generated Tue Dec 28 19:47:28 2010 by user wstraka on craackly.ssec.wisc.edu
file A:
path: /data/wstraka/OTTC_v4/truth_data/geocatL2.GOES-R.2006097.184500.hdf
md5sum for file A: 2c638b2f8353ef0cd8c1f6d775fceb25
last modified: Wed Nov 17 23:08:00 2010
file B:
path: /home/wstraka/geocat_fwiw_ottc/l2_output/geocatL2.GOES-R.2006097.184500.hdf
md5sum for file B: 3bf210d75992cff6ca9fa1f89a54c95a
last modified: Tue Dec 28 19:31:31 2010
A configuration file was used to control the production report.
Please see this copy of the configuration file
for details.
latitude in A: pixel_latitude
latitude in B: pixel_latitude
longitude in A: pixel_longitude
longitude in B: pixel_longitude
WARNING: 22 data points
(0.00055% of all data)
show possible mismatch in values stored in file a
and file b longitude and latitude values. Depending on the degree of mismatch, some data value comparisons
in this report may be distorted or spatially nonsensical. Please consider re-running this report and including an
examination of your longitude and latitude variables with appropriate epsilons in order to analyze the significance
of the difference.
View mismatching points in A's lon/lat system
View mismatching points in B's lon/lat system
variable name: pixel_latitude
epsilon value: 0.0
"missing" data value in A: -32768
"missing" data value in B: -32768
units in A: degrees_north
units in B: degrees_north
