Comparison Summary

report produced with glance, version 0.2.6.17
comparison generated Wed May 19 21:02:56 2010 by user wstraka on craackly.ssec.wisc.edu

file A:

path: /data/wstraka/PFAAST_CRTM/PFAAST//MSG8_SEVIRI_2006236_1600_00_AWG_VOLCANIC_ASH.nc
md5sum for file A: 67e86145380911c0a4f0d7687680ba33
last modified: Tue May 18 17:10:03 2010

file B:

path: /data/wstraka/PFAAST_CRTM/CRTM//MSG8_SEVIRI_2006236_1600_00_AWG_VOLCANIC_ASH.nc
md5sum for file B: c108ea81ed8c5b0aaf55fd84f7cf1795
last modified: Tue May 18 17:07:26 2010

A configuration file was used to control the production report.
Please see this copy of the configuration file for details.

latitude: Latitude
longitude: Longitude
longitude/latitude comparison epsilon: 0.01

lon/lat data that is invalid in either file A or file B: 25.39%

Compared Variables

	Variable: Ash Effective Radius Epsilon used: 0.01 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 17.3527% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 99.9349%
	Variable: Ash Mass Loading Epsilon used: 0.01 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 2.16844% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 99.9349%
	Variable: Ash Top Height Epsilon used: 0.01 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 0.0181785% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 99.9349%
	Variable: Latitude Epsilon used: 0.01 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 100% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%
	Variable: Longitude Epsilon used: 0.01 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 100% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%

Shared Variables

The following variables were common to both files:

Latitude
Ash_Reff
Ash_Height
Ash_Loading
Longitude