report produced with glance, version 0.2.6.24
comparison generated Thu Nov 25 17:08:07 2010 by user wstraka on craackly.ssec.wisc.edu
file A:
path: /data/wstraka/Turb_v4/truth_data/geocatL2.GOES-12.2006096.231500.hdf
md5sum for file A: 42b7748205a3c9b719cbe7a91098ad24
last modified: Wed Nov 17 16:32:33 2010
file B:
path: /data/wstraka/Turb_v4/test_data/geocatL2.GOES-12.2006096.231500.hdf
md5sum for file B: b474ad7f7f04edfdc86c110e7725b076
last modified: Thu Nov 25 16:24:10 2010
A configuration file was used to control the production report.
Please see this copy of the configuration file
for details.
latitude in A: pixel_latitude
latitude in B: pixel_latitude
longitude in A: pixel_longitude
longitude in B: pixel_longitude
WARNING: 1233 data points
(0.02854% of all data)
show possible mismatch in values stored in file a
and file b longitude and latitude values. Depending on the degree of mismatch, some data value comparisons
in this report may be distorted or spatially nonsensical. Please consider re-running this report and including an
examination of your longitude and latitude variables with appropriate epsilons in order to analyze the significance
of the difference.
variable name: pixel_latitude
epsilon value: 0.1
"missing" data value in A: -32768
"missing" data value in B: -32768
units in A: degrees_north
units in B: degrees_north