File Comparison Summary

report produced with glance, version 0.3.1.6
analysis generated Tue Mar 8 15:53:05 2016 by user wstraka on presto.ssec.wisc.edu

file A:

path: /data/users/stevew/GLANCE/geocatL1.HIMAWARI-8.2015216.235000.area.hdf
md5sum for file A: de039a252cbf180dccdc4a7db7f84b9c
last modified: Tue Mar 8 00:13:39 2016

file B:

path: /data/users/stevew/GLANCE/geocatL1.HIMAWARI-8.2015216.235000.hdf
md5sum for file B: 302688e8cbb858f7ca17bcf89d2a8009
last modified: Tue Mar 8 00:13:46 2016

A configuration file was used to control the production of this report.
Please see this copy of the configuration file for details.

Compared Variables

Variable: BT14
Epsilon used: 0.1
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 4.5341%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 89.0638%

Shared Variables

The following variables were common to both files:

bc1_planck
calibration_slope_degrade
calibration_solar_constant
fk2_planck
channel_2_reflectance
channel_14_brightness_temperature
pixel_relative_azimuth_angle
fk1_planck
pixel_solar_zenith_angle
scan_line_time
pixel_satellite_zenith_angle
pixel_ecosystem_type
channel_wavenumber
pixel_longitude
pixel_latitude
calibration_offset
bc2_planck
calibration_slope
pixel_surface_type