Comparison Summary

report produced with glance, version 0.2.6.10
comparison generated Tue Sep 29 20:08:35 2009 by user wstraka on craackly.ssec.wisc.edu

file A:

path: /data/wstraka/temp/NC4_NC3_TEST//NC3/MSG8_SEVIRI_2005329_1200_00_AWG_VOLCANIC_ASH.nc
md5sum for file A: 2381efcc7ae715ffb11c2d0b6ffdf521
last modified: Tue Sep 29 16:18:29 2009

file B:

path: /data/wstraka/temp/NC4_NC3_TEST//NC4/MSG8_SEVIRI_2005329_1200_00_AWG_VOLCANIC_ASH.nc
md5sum for file B: 1709b13531800e24169445456206d184
last modified: Tue Sep 29 15:51:03 2009

latitude: Latitude
longitude: Longitude

lon/lat data that is invalid in either file A or file B: 25.39%

Compared Variables

	Variable: Ash_Height Epsilon used: 0.1 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 96.4338% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 99.9888%
	Variable: Ash_Loading Epsilon used: 0.1 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 98.2198% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 99.9888%
	Variable: Ash_Reff Epsilon used: 0.1 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 99.2111% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 99.9888%
	Variable: Latitude Epsilon used: 0.1 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 100% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%
	Variable: Longitude Epsilon used: 0.1 Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 100% Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%

Shared Variables

The following variables were common to both files:

Latitude
Ash_Reff
Ash_Height
Ash_Loading
Longitude