File Comparison Summary

report produced with glance, version 0.2.7.05
comparison generated Thu Apr 3 20:20:51 2014 by user wstraka on presto.ssec.wisc.edu

file A:

path: /data/users/wstraka/proxy_harris/AIT/GRB_VAL_band12_ncsa_fcm_rem_2km_fd_sim_abi_2005_0604_2000utc.nc
md5sum for file A: 28ee0f684f3e29937cde0b1238e0f62f
last modified: Thu Nov 15 17:31:00 2012

file B:

path: /data/users/wstraka/proxy_harris/CONUS_03212014_IPS/OT_ABI-L2-CMIPF-M3C12_G16_s2014078225359_e2014078225359_c2014078230459.nc
md5sum for file B: 0181136ab1528afa469c253c02d412f6
last modified: Wed Mar 26 17:23:14 2014

A configuration file was used to control the production of this report.
Please see this copy of the configuration file for details.

Compared Variables

Variable: 9.7um BT
Epsilon used: 0.0
R-squared Correlation Coefficient: 0.0883585097226
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 0%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 99.9533%

Shared Variables

The following variables were common to both files:

y
x

Unique Variables

Variables only found in file A:

qualityflag
Projection
ABI_TBB_b12
time
Brit_val_08bit_b12
Brit_val_12bit_b12
ABI_Rad_b12
swathtimes

Variables only found in file B:

percent_valid_pixels
planck_fk1
valid_pixel_count
planck_bc2
planck_bc1
max_brightness_temperature
min_brightness_temperature
good_points_overall
planck_fk2
std_dev_brightness_temperature
data_samples
y_image
CMI
percent_uncorrectable_GRB_errors
time_bounds
goes_imager_projection
nominal_satellite_subpoint_lat
nominal_satellite_height
total_number_of_points
x_image
outlier_pixel_count
esun
DQF
kappa0
percent_out_of_range_pixels
_nc4_non_coord_t
outlier_pixels
percent_no_value_pixels
nominal_satellite_subpoint_lon
percent_uncorrectable_L0_errors
earth_sun_distance_anomaly_in_AU
band_id
geospatial_lat_lon_extent
mean_brightness_temperature
band_wavelength