report produced with glance, version 0.2.6.24
comparison generated Fri Jun 24 22:00:07 2011 by user wstraka on craackly.ssec.wisc.edu
file A:
path: /data/wstraka/OTTC_v5/truth_data/geocatL2.GOES-R.2006097.184500.hdf
md5sum for file A: 5a88650678736c9a0af5849f9dfca50a
last modified: Thu Jun 2 19:25:21 2011
file B:
path: /data/wstraka/OTTC_v5/test_data/geocatL2.GOES-R.2006097.184500.hdf
md5sum for file B: d556b74738c849c98d88493c9e88d79c
last modified: Fri Jun 24 21:50:30 2011
A configuration file was used to control the production report.
Please see this copy of the configuration file
for details.
latitude in A: pixel_latitude
latitude in B: pixel_latitude
longitude in A: pixel_longitude
longitude in B: pixel_longitude
WARNING: 22 data points
(0.00055% of all data)
show possible mismatch in values stored in file a
and file b longitude and latitude values. Depending on the degree of mismatch, some data value comparisons
in this report may be distorted or spatially nonsensical. Please consider re-running this report and including an
examination of your longitude and latitude variables with appropriate epsilons in order to analyze the significance
of the difference.
View mismatching points in A's lon/lat system
View mismatching points in B's lon/lat system
lon/lat data that is invalid in either file A or file B: 14.04%
![]()
Variable: Latitude
Epsilon used: 0.0
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 99.9995%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%![]()
Variable: Longitude
Epsilon used: 0.0
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 99.9998%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%![]()
Variable: OT Grid BT14
Epsilon used: 0.1
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 100%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%![]()
Variable: OT Grid Flag
Epsilon used: 0.1
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 100%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%![]()
Variable: OT Grid ID
Epsilon used: 0.1
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 100%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%![]()
Variable: OT Grid Mag
Epsilon used: 0.1
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 100%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%![]()
Variable: OT Num Anvil
Epsilon used: 0.1
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 100%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%![]()
Variable: OT QA
Epsilon used: 0.1
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 100%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%![]()
Variable: TC BT14 Diff
Epsilon used: 0.1
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 100%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%![]()
Variable: TC Grid Flg
Epsilon used: 0.1
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 100%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%![]()
Variable: TC Match Grid ID
Epsilon used: 0.1
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 100%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%![]()
Variable: TC QA
Epsilon used: 0.1
Finite values within one epsilon of difference: 100%
Data that matched in finite-ness between the files: 100%
The following variables were common to both files:
overshootcouplet_overshooting_top_qa_flag
overshootcouplet_overshooting_top_grid_bt14
nwp_x_index
pixel_longitude
overshootcouplet_overshooting_couplet_grid_bt14_difference
pixel_relative_azimuth_angle
overshootcouplet_overshooting_top_grid_magnitude
overshootcouplet_overshooting_top_grid_flag
overshootcouplet_overshooting_couplet_grid_matching_ID
overshootcouplet_overshooting_top_pqi_flag
pixel_ecosystem_type
overshootcouplet_overshooting_couplet_grid_flag
overshootcouplet_overshooting_top_grid_ID_number
overshootcouplet_overshooting_couplet_qa_flag
pixel_latitude
overshootcouplet_overshooting_top_grid_number_of_anvil_pixels
pixel_surface_type
overshootcouplet_overshooting_couplet_pqi_flag
nwp_y_index
pixel_satellite_zenith_angle
pixel_solar_zenith_angle