SSEC Home 15th International Winds Workshop April 12 - 16, 2021 Virtual (13 UTC Start Time)

  • Home
  • Agenda
  • Oral Presentations
  • Posters
  • Test Ninja Table
  • Research Support
  • UW
  • CIMSS
  • Data Services
  • AOSS Library
  • Partners
  • Careers
  • Disclaimer
  • Staff Directory
  • For Employees

Two Stage Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Calculating Atmospheric Motion Vectors

Amir Ouyed Hernandez, Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona

  • Xubin Zeng, Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona

    ●
  • Longtao Wu, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

    ●
  • Derek Posselt, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

    ●
  • Hui Su, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

The large errors (e.g ~ 7 m/s) of Atmospheric Motion Vectors (AMV) may be a consequence of moisturetracking
algorithms not incorporating state variable or physical information (e.g. moisture).
We developed a physics-informed, artificial intelligence algorithm that corrects AMV errors using
Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) fields, called the University of Arizona (UA) Algorithm. UA uses
a variational method as a first step, the second step then filters the noise of first stage AMVs using a
Random Forest (RF) model that learns the physics informed, error correction from NWP fields. We
compare UA’s performance with a traditional algorithm from Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) by using
model output (GEOS-5 nature run). We run our experiments globally for pressure heights of 500 hPa and
850 hPa, and for January 1-3, 2006, and July 1-3, 2006.

UA outputs AMVs with low Root Mean Square Vector Differences (RMSVDs) of ~ 2 m/s for the tropics
and ~ 2 – 3 m/s for mid-latitudes and the poles, whereas JPL outputs much higher RMSVDs of ~ 3 m/s for
the tropics and ~ 3 – 9 m/s for the mid-latitudes and poles. Furthermore, UA’s RMSVDs are lower than
the intrinsic error (calculated from reanalysis data) of NWP fields. Even for the most error-prone regions,
such as in regions of low moisture gradients and where winds are along moisture isolines, UA’s absolute
speed difference with “truth” stays within ~ 3 m/s, in contrast to much higher values for JPL.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Contact Webmaster
UW Logo
1225 W. Dayton St. · Madison, WI 53706, USA · 608-263-6750